GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

6Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate implantation potential of cleavage-stage embryos cultured in medium containing 2 ng/ml granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus control medium, according to embryo morphological quality and then transferred on day 3. Methods: Explorative secondary data analysis of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded prospective study of 1149 couples with embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI. This analysis includes a subgroup of 422 subjects with either single-embryo transfer (SET, N = 286) or double-embryo transfer of two embryos with equivalent morphological quality (DET, N = 136). Implantation rate and live birth rate were assessed according to category of morphological embryo quality on day 3. Results: Culture with GM-CSF did not increase the implantation rate for embryos classified as poor quality. A trend towards greater benefit of GM-CSF on implantation and survival until live birth for top-quality embryos (TQEs) compared with poor-quality embryos was observed, although not statistically significant. For TQEs, the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby was: 40.9 ± 5.3% (GM-CSF) versus 30.5 ± 4.6% (control) (P = 0.24; odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–2.59), and for embryos with less than 6 cells at day 3 this same rate was: 7.4 ± 3.3% (GM-CSF) versus 12.0 ± 4.0% (control) (P = 0.26; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17–1.61). Conclusion: This exploratory analysis is consistent with GM-CSF protecting morphologically normal embryos from culture-induced stress and does not support an effect of GM-CSF in rescuing poor-quality embryos. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00565747.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez-Wallberg, K. A., Munding, B., Ziebe, S., & Robertson, S. A. (2020). GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 301(5), 1341–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05532-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free