Routine use of clinical management guidelines in Australian general practice

21Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Significant gaps remain between recommendations of evidence-based guidelines and primary health care practice in Australia. This paper aims to evaluate factors associated with the use of guidelines reported by Australian GPs. Secondary analysis was performed on a survey of primary care practitioners which was conducted by the Commonwealth Fund in 2009: 1016 general practitioners responded in Australia (response rate 52%). Two-thirds of Australian GPs reported that they routinely used evidence-based treatment guidelines for the management of four conditions: diabetes, depression, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension - a higher proportion than in most other countries. Having non-medical staff educating patients about self-management, and a system of GP reminders to provide patients with test results or guideline-based intervention or screening tests, were associated with a higher probability of guidelines use. Older GP age was associated with lower probability of guideline usage. The negative association with age of the doctor may reflect a tendency to rely on experience rather than evidence-based guidelines. The association with greater use of reminders and self-management is consistent with the chronic illness model. © La Trobe University 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, M. F., Lloyd, J., Krastev, Y., Fanaian, M., Davies, G. P., Zwar, N., & Liaw, S. T. (2014). Routine use of clinical management guidelines in Australian general practice. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 20(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY12078

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free