Abstract
Two alternative versions of the Team Climate Inventory (TCI; Anderson & West, 1994), consisting of either four or five factors, have been introduced by innovation researchers. This study compared the psychometric properties of these two versions by using data obtained from a Finnish sample of 2 265 local government employees. Exploratory factor analysis of the entire sample reproduced both the four-and five-factor versions with good internal consistencies. When a distinction was made between samples with low and high job complexity, significant differences between the four-and five-factor versions emerged. Exploratory factor analysis of the sample with low job complexity suggested that both factor versions obtained clear and interpretable structures. However, only the five-factor version obtained a clear factor structure in the sample of high job complexity. Further LISREL confirmatory factor analyses of both samples suggested that the five-factor structure provided significantly better fit to the data than the four-factor version. In conclusion, the five-factor version of the TCI, including subscales of vision, participative safety, task orientation, support for innovation and interaction frequency, is preferred to the four-factor version because it is more structurally intact and less likely to be affected by job complexity.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kivimäki, M., George, K., Elovainio, M., Thomson, L., Kalliomäki-Levanto, T., & Heikkilä, A. (1997). The Team Climate Inventory (TCI) - Four or five factors? Testing the structure of TCI in samples of low and high complexity jobs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00655.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.