Optimizing treatment switch for virologic failure during first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings

7Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluated adult Nigerian patients with antiretroviral switch to second-line treatment with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r)-based regimens due to virologic failure (confirmed HIV-1 RNA viral load [VL] >1000 copies/mL) during first-line antiretroviral therapy. Proportion of patients with VL >400 copies/mL and characteristics associated with nonsuppression during second-line treatment are described. Approximately 15% of patients (34 of 225) had VL >400 copies/mL at 1-year after treatment switch to PI/r-based regimens. In adjusted analyses, VL ≥5 log10 copies/mL at treatment switch (odds ratio [OR] 2.90 [confidence interval (CI) 1.21-6.93]); duration of first-line treatment after virologic failure >180 days (OR 2.56 [CI 1.0-6.54]); and PI/r regimen adherence <90% (OR 3.27 [CI 1.39-7.68]) were associated with VL >400 copies/mL at 1 year of second-line treatment. We therefore recommend that the maximum permissible time between suspicion of virologic failure and completion of antiretroviral treatment switch should not exceed 6 months when patients develop first-line antiretroviral failure in resource-limited settings. © The Author(s) 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adetunji, A. A., Achenbach, C., Feinglass, J., Darin, K. M., Scarsi, K. K., Ekong, E., … Murphy, R. (2013). Optimizing treatment switch for virologic failure during first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, 12(4), 236–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545109712463733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free