Enhancing the Biopsychosocial Approach to Perioperative Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial of the Perioperative Pain Self-management (PePS) Intervention

17Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to pilot the PePS intervention, based on principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), to determine feasibility and preliminary efficacy for preventing chronic pain and long-term opioid use. Summary Background Data: Surgery can precipitate the development of both chronic pain and long-term opioid use. CBT can reduce distress and improve functioning among patients with chronic pain. Adapting CBT to target acute pain management in the postoperative period may impact longerterm postoperative outcomes. Methods: This was a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial in a mixed surgical sample with assignment to standard care or PePS, with primary outcomes at 3-months postsurgery. The sample consisted of rural-dwelling United States Military Veterans. Results: Logistic regression analyses found a significant effect of PePS on odds of moderate-severe pain (on average over the last week) at 3-months postsurgery, controlling for preoperative moderate-severe pain: Adjusted odds ratio = 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07-0.95, P < 0.05). At 3-months postsurgery, 15% (6/39) of standard care participants and 2% (1/45) of PePS participants used opioids in the prior seven days: Adjusted Odds ratio = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01- 1.29, P=.08). Changes in depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing were not significantly different between arms. Conclusions: The findings from this study support the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the PePS intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadlandsmyth, K., Conrad, M., Steffensmeier, K. S., Van Tiem, J., Obrecht, A., Cullen, J. J., & Vander Weg, M. W. (2022). Enhancing the Biopsychosocial Approach to Perioperative Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial of the Perioperative Pain Self-management (PePS) Intervention. Annals of Surgery, 275(1), E8–E14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004671

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free