Facial esthetics and subjective impairment assessed after maxillomandibular advancement surgery for patients with obstructive sleep apnea

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To assess facial esthetics and quality of life (QoL) as measure of success or failure after maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).  Methods: Visual analog scales (VAS) on facial esthetics and QoL survey, including EQ-5D3L, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) were collected. Outcomes were analyzed for surgical-success/failure after MMA. Results: Forty-one patients returned completed surveys (response: 66%). Mean VAS on facial esthetics was 57 ± 22 mm preoperative and 51 ± 24 mm postoperative (p = 0.217). When MMA was considered a surgical-failure, VAS was significantly more negative (40 ± 22 mm; p = 0.026). EQ-5D-3L showed an overall mean score of 73.2 ± 15.7, ESS was 6.3 ± 5.4, and FOSQ was 16.0 ± 3.3. Conclusion: No significant alteration of facial esthetics were reported after MMA; however, lower QoL was associated with surgical-failure; whereas, in surgical-success, QoL were higher.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Ruiter, M. H. T., Apperloo, R. C., Milstein, D. M. J., & de Lange, J. (2023). Facial esthetics and subjective impairment assessed after maxillomandibular advancement surgery for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular and Sleep Practice, 41(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2020.1801223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free