Convex hull and tour crossings in the Euclidean traveling salesperson problem: Implications for human performance studies

52Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently there has been growing interest among psychologists in human performance on the Euclidean traveling salesperson problem (E-TSP). A debate has been initiated on what strategy people use in solving visually presented E-TSP instances. The most prominent hypothesis is the convex-hull hypothesis, originally proposed by MacGregor and Ormerod (1996). We argue that, in the literature so far, there is no evidence for this hypothesis. Alternatively we propose and motivate the hypothesis that people aim at avoiding crossings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Rooij, I., Stege, U., & Schactman, A. (2003). Convex hull and tour crossings in the Euclidean traveling salesperson problem: Implications for human performance studies. Memory and Cognition, 31(2), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free