Abstract
This research project aimed at obtaining an in-depth analysis of the experiences of self-identified co-dependents, who chose twelve-steps groups as a way for dealing with difficulties identified as co-dependency. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used as the methodology for the research. Eight participants volunteered from local support groups for co-dependency in the UK. Data were collected through 3 in-depth interviews with each participant over a period of 3–6 months. A visual method was used to gain a more in-depth phenomenological perspective. It included photographs, drawings and images chosen by the participants to describe their experiences. The analysis revealed 2 contradicting and complementary themes: (1) representations of the twelve-step group as a helpful tool and (2) representations of the twelve-step group as no longer meaningful. It demonstrated that the participants found their groups useful as an initial pathway for recovery; however, it did not feature as a central aspect in their recovery, as different levels of engagement were described. The results of this study provide a base for developing a more empathic and contextualised understanding of the experience of individuals who attend twelve-step groups for co-dependency, which in turn will enable health professionals to offer support which is relevant to these individuals’ experiences.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bacon, I., McKay, E., Reynolds, F., & McIntyre, A. (2021). An Examination of the Lived Experience of Attending Twelve-Step Groups for Co-dependency. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(5), 1646–1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00253-9
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.