Role of observational studies versus clinical trials in ESRD research

24Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Randomized controlled clinical trials have been considered by many to be the only reliable source for information in health services research. This review considers the advantages and limitations of observational studies as compared to randomized clinical trials. It presents specific examples of scientific research done with observational registry data to show that some research is more feasible with an observational approach and that this approach may lead to better designs of prospective clinical trials. Such trials continue to be the gold standard in outcomes research. © 2000 by the International Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Port, F. K. (2000). Role of observational studies versus clinical trials in ESRD research. In Kidney International, Supplement (Vol. 57). Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07402.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free