Abstract
Objective: Precise transducer calibration is an essential prerequisite for reliable surface registration based on ultrasound B-mode imaging devices. The clinical usage of a novel B-mode transducer calibration technique was evaluated and its attainable calibration precision assessed. Materials and Methods: The Three Wire Method and the Cambridge Calibration Method were used as reference techniques to compare the efficiency, calibration precision and spatial requirements of the different techniques. A total of 20 calibration trials were performed using each technique and were statistically evaluated for accuracy and speed. Results: The mean error characterizing the calibration precision of the Three Wire Method was 3.2 mm, obtained in a phantom with a volume of 14 × - 106 mm3 in 18.48 min. The Cambridge method resulted in a mean calibration error of 2.2 mm, but required a larger phantom with a volume of 35 × 106 mm3 to be used for a duration of 9.30 min. The proposed method yielded an average calibration error of 1.9 mm and was performed, on average, in 2 min using a phantom with a size smaller than 1 × - 106 mm3. Conclusions: The suggested calibration method offers decreased time and space while retaining an equivalent calibration precision when compared to established reference methods. © 2003 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kowal, J., Amstutz, C. A., Caversaccio, M., & Nolte, L. P. (2003). On the development and comparative evaluation of an ultrasound B-mode probe calibration method. Computer Aided Surgery, 8(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.3109/10929080309146045
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.