'Fighting' or 'Conflict'? an approach to revealing concepts of terms in political discourse

1Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous work on the epistemology of fact-checking indicated the dilemma between the needs of binary answers for the public and ambiguity of political discussion. Determining concepts represented by terms in political discourse can be considered as a Word-Sense Disambiguation (WSD) task. The analysis of political discourse, however, requires identifying precise concepts of terms from relatively small data. This work attempts to provide a basic framework for revealing concepts of terms in political discourse with explicit contextual information. The framework consists of three parts: 1) extracting important terms, 2) generating concordance for each term with stipulative definitions and explanations, and 3) agglomerating similar information of the term by hierarchical clustering. Utterances made by Prime Minister Abe Shinzo in the Diet of Japan are used to examine our framework. Importantly, we revealed the conceptual inconsistency of the term Sonritsukiki- jitai. The framework was proved to work, but only for a small number of terms due to lack of explicit contextual information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, L., & Kageura, K. (2017). “Fighting” or “Conflict”? an approach to revealing concepts of terms in political discourse. In EMNLP 2017 - 2nd Workshop on Natural Language Processing Meets Journalism, NLPmJ 2017 - Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 90–94). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-4216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free