Patients, clients, users or customers: What should we call people attending sexual health services?

8Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and methodology: In sexual health clinics there is debate on whether to call service users 'patients' or 'clients'and this mirrors an ongoing dialogue in the medical literature. The authors undertook a questionnaire survey in fi ve UK centres of clinic attendees and staff to assess their preference. Results: A total of 1428 clinic attendees and 250 staff members completed questionnaires. 61% of attendees who responded preferred 'patient', with 23% expressing no preference. Only 9% of respondents preferred the term 'client'. 148 (59%) of all staff groups preferred the term 'patient' followed by 82 (33%) selecting 'client'. No staff member opted for 'customer' or 'user'as the preferred term. The difference between preference for 'patient' between doctors and nurses was statistically signifi cant, with most doctors preferring the term 'patient'. Out of a total of 84 nurses, there was equal preference for 'patient' and 'client' (38 nurses in each group). Comments from attendees and staff who responded generally emphasised the concept of the 'caring' role of the health professional towards people attending the services. Discussion and conclusions: The majority of people attending sexual health clinics and medical and clerical staff working in these services expressed a preference to retain the title of 'patient'. The main justifi cation for this appeared to relate to the concept of caring for people. The authors therefore conclude that the terminology in sexual health services should revert to predominantly using the term 'patient'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loudon, J., Baird, A., Haider, Z., Sein, E., Prabakar, I., & Gebbie, A. (2012). Patients, clients, users or customers: What should we call people attending sexual health services? Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 38(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free