THE NULL HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TEST AND THE DICHOTOMIZATION OF THE P-VALUE: Errare Humanum Est

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Decision-making in healthcare is complex and needs to be based on the best scientific evidence. In this pro-cess, information derived from statistical analysis of data is crucial, which can be developed from either frequentist or Bayesian perspectives. When it comes to the frequentist field, the null hypothesis significance test (NHST) and its p-value is one of the most widely used techniques in different disciplines. However, NHST has been subjected to questioning from different academic points of view, which has led to it being considered as one of the causes of the so-called replicability crisis in science. In this review article, we provide a brief historical account of its development, summarize the underlying methods, describe some controversies and limitations, address misuse and misinterpretation, and finally give some scopes and reflections in the context of biomedical research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mezones-Holguín, E., Al-Kassab-córdova, A., Soto-Becerra, P., Hernández-Díaz, S., & Kaufman, J. S. (2024). THE NULL HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TEST AND THE DICHOTOMIZATION OF THE P-VALUE: Errare Humanum Est. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 41(4), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.17843/RPMESP.2024.414.14285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free