Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals

49Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Effective July 22, 2011, a new law in the state of Washington requires any donor of sperm or eggs to provide a medical history and identifying information to fertility clinics. It also allows donor-conceived individuals to request this information from clinics once they reach the age of eighteen. This is a significant legislative milestone and a promising development in a country that has consistently shied away from regulating the infertility industry in any way. What do we as a society owe donor-conceived individuals in terms of obtaining access to information about their genetic origins? This essay addresses just one of this set of issues: the regulatory changes required to address the medical interests of donor-conceived individuals, regardless of whether a human right to know one's genetic origins is acknowledged.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ravitsky, V. (2012). Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals. Hastings Center Report, 42(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free