Electrocardiography and Echocardiography Findings in Contemporary Dancers

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Alterations in cardiac structure and function as a result of chronic training have been extensively reported in the literature. To date, there is limited data on dancers. This study attempts to define cardiac electrical, structural, and functional characteristics in female contemporary dancers. Forty-four female full-time contemporary dance students (age: 23.0 ±5.6 years; height: 165.2 ± 7.9 cm; body mass: 59.2 ± 7.2 kg) volunteered for the study and underwent 12-lead electrocardiography and two-dimensional echocardiography. Echocardiographic results were compared with 30 age-matched and gender-matched controls. Sixteen percent (7/44) of dancers presented with sinus bradycardia (< 60 bpm) and seven percent (3/44) demonstrated shortened PR intervals (< 120 ms). Sokolow voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy was observed in only 4% (2/44). Fourteen percent of dancers (6/44) demonstrated right axis deviation and nine percent (4/44) had incomplete right bundle branch block. One dancer exhibited nodal rhythm. Minor ST segment elevation (< 0.2 mV) was present in 7% (3/44) of dancers, and equally minor ST segment depression (< 0.2 mV) was present in 7% (3/44). Negative T waves and large T waves (>1.0mV) were observed in 14% (6/44) and 4% (2/44) of the dancers respectively. QRS and QT duration were within normal limits for all dancers. Echocardiography revealed no significant differences between dancers and controls for all structural and functional indices. It is concluded that contemporary dancers demonstrate limited cardiac structure and function changes compared to matched controls.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whyte, G. P., George, K., Redding, E., Wilson, M., Lane, A., & Firooz, S. (2003). Electrocardiography and Echocardiography Findings in Contemporary Dancers. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science, 7(3), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X0300700304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free