Architectural analysis of plant root systems

  • FITTER A
  • STICKLAND T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The techniques of architectural analysis were applied to the root systems of plants growing under field conditions, to determine their validity in this situation and to measure the extent and causes of plasticity and of interspecific differences in root architecture in co‐existing species. In a three‐year study of two species ( Trifolium repens L. and Plantago lanceolata L.) on eleven different soils, large differences were found between species, soils and years; much of the variation in the root architecture of T. repens could be explained in terms of soil moisture concentration. On two woodland sites, the root architecture of five species was followed over a 15–month period, and at one a manipulative experiment involving irrigation and nitrogen and phosphorus addition was set up. There were large differences between species in root architecture and seasonal changes in some aspects (topology and exterior link length), which probably represent developmental patterns. Irrigation induced topological changes in one species ( Galium aparine L.) which were consistent with the results of the three‐year study, but not apparently with an earlier model. In the case of Mercurialis perennis L., however, both irrigation and N and P addition brought about the predicted changes in root architecture, namely shorter interior links and lower topological index, though N had the opposite effect on exterior links. Interior link length differed widely between species, but showed little temporal variation, suggesting that it may be a valuable character for further studies. These results illustrate the validity and potential of architectural analysis for the study of root systems extracted from field soils.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

FITTER, A. H., & STICKLAND, T. R. (1992). Architectural analysis of plant root systems. New Phytologist, 121(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01110.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free