Taking cantonal variations of integration policy seriously - Or how to validate international concepts at the subnational comparative level

39Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Subnational varieties of immigrant integration policy, which are particularly salient in federal states, remain largely neglected by migration studies. Following Lijphart, who long demanded to verify international research at the subnational level, this study aims at capturing subnational policy variations using the example of Swiss cantons. In line with international approaches, cantonal integration policies are conceptualized and measured in terms of immigrants' ease or difficulty of access to civic, political, socio-structural, as well as cultural and religious rights and obligations. The transfer of an international concept to the subnational level facilitates a validation of the former, which constitutes a second neglected research field. Finally, a look at the empirical evidence allows testing the construct validity of our measurement: in line with theoretical assumptions, our data reveal a clear linguistic divide, an institutionalised "Röschtigraben", with German speaking cantons exhibiting overall more restrictive policies than Latin cantons. © 2011 Swiss Political Science Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manatschal, A. (2011). Taking cantonal variations of integration policy seriously - Or how to validate international concepts at the subnational comparative level. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02027.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free