Are we sitting comfortably? Domestic imaginaries, laptop practices, and energy use

26Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The considerable literature on domestic energy consumption practices has tended to focus on either the (re)production and contestation of normative imaginaries, or the links between escalating standards and energy use. Far less has been written which links these related areas together. Accordingly, this paper is positioned at the intersection of debates on domestic consumption, energy use, and home cultures. Through a qualitative study of laptop use in the home, we illustrate how energy-intensive practices, such as 'always-on-ness', and changing computer ecologies and infrastructures, are intimately bound up with the reproduction of particular domestic imaginaries of family and home. A key insight in this paper is that a purely physiological conception of comfort would fail to explain fully why practices such as always-on-ness emerge, and thus we theorise comfort as an accomplishment comprised of inseparable temporal, bodily, spatial, and material elements. Ultimately, we argue here that comfort needs to be understood as a multivalent imaginary that is itself bound up in broader idealised notions of family and home in order to comprehend shifting practices, computing ecologies, and rising energy consumption. © 2012 Pion and its Licensors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spinney, J., Green, N., Burningham, K., Cooper, G., & Uzzell, D. (2012). Are we sitting comfortably? Domestic imaginaries, laptop practices, and energy use. Environment and Planning A, 44(11), 2629–2645. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44403

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free