Computer-aided graphing: A comparative study

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite the massive investment of time and money in information technology it is difficult to get clear evidence of ‘value-added’ in relation to IT use in our schools. This comparative study was conducted to investigate if there are any advantages to pupils using computer generated graphs as opposed to plotting them manually. The context of the study was a secondary science practical activity involving electrical characteristic graphs. There was evidence that plotting graphs manually not only caused a time penalty but difficulties in drawing the best fit lines reinforced, rather than corrected, misunderstandings about the relationships between the variables. The positive effects noted when using the computer approach seemed to be most significant for younger and less able pupils. The data on pupil-teacher discussions suggested that this was a significant factor in assisting the development of pupils’ interpretation skills whatever approach was adopted. The study was able to make suggestions on the best teaching approach to take when asking pupils to interpret information presented in a graphical form. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barton, R. (1997). Computer-aided graphing: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 6(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759399700200004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free