Lobbying on multiple routes to influence national legislation: German federalism and the European Union

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article analyses how interest groups lobby at different levels of government to influence national legislation. Adapting Greenwood’s (2017) argument about routes for influence-seeking in the EU to national policymaking in a multi-level system, we argue that interest groups can pursue three distinct multi-level routes to circumvent the national executive and parliament: a Brussels route, a domestic subnational route, and a subnational-Brussels route to national policymaking. Investigating the case of Germany, our analysis of survey data on interest group behaviour shows that, firstly, multi-level-lobbying is a complement rather than a substitute to national-level lobbying. Secondly, interest groups try to affect federal legislation much more often via the subnational than via the supranational level, especially when they share a common goal with their subnational government. A third finding is that groups also address venues without formal legislative power. Overall, our study shows the strategic importance of multi-level lobbying in national policymaking.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spohr, F., Bernhagen, P., Krüger, K., & Goldberg, F. (2025). Lobbying on multiple routes to influence national legislation: German federalism and the European Union. Regional and Federal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2025.2553196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free