A Radical Sodium Reduction Policy Is Not Supported by Randomized Controlled Trials or Observational Studies: Grading the Evidence

27Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several health institutions recommend sodium intake be reduced to below 2,300mg, which means that 6-7 billion individuals should alter their diet to accommodate. Such a radical recommendation should be based on solid evidence. However, this review reveals that (i) there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) allocating individuals to below 2,300mg and measuring health outcomes; (ii) RCTs allocating risk groups such as obese prehypertensive individuals and hypertensive individuals down to (but not below) 2,300mg show no effect of sodium reduction on all-cause mortality; (iii) RCTs allocating individuals to below 2,300mg show a minimal effect on blood pressure in the healthy population (less than 1mm Hg) and significant increases in renin, aldosterone, noradrenalin cholesterol, and triglyceride; and (iv) observational studies show that sodium intakes below 2,645 and above 4,945mg are associated with increased mortality. Given that 90% of the worlds' population currently consumes sodium within the optimal range of 2,645-4,945mg, there is no scientific basis for a public health recommendation to alter sodium intake.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graudal, N. (2016, May 1). A Radical Sodium Reduction Policy Is Not Supported by Randomized Controlled Trials or Observational Studies: Grading the Evidence. American Journal of Hypertension. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpw006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free