Over and under-utilization of cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors by primary care physicians and specialists: The tortoise and the hare revisited

19Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare prescribing trends and appropriateness of use of traditional and cyclooxygenase-2 selective (COX-2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: One thousand five hundred and seventy-six adult patients continuously enrolled for at least 1 year with an independent practice association of a University-associated managed care plan who were started on a traditional NSAID or a COX-2 inhibitor from 1999 to 2002 and received at least 3 separate medication fills. MEASUREMENTS: Physician specialty was identified from office visits. Appropriateness of utilization was based on gastrointestinal risk characteristics. RESULTS: Primary care patients were younger and less likely to have comorbid conditions. Despite similar GI risk, COX-2 use among patients seen by PCPs was half that of patients seen by specialists (21% vs 44%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Smet, B. D., Fendrick, A. M., Stevenson, J. G., & Bernstein, S. J. (2006). Over and under-utilization of cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors by primary care physicians and specialists: The tortoise and the hare revisited. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(7), 694–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00463.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free