Propensity scores and the surgeon

112Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based surgery has been established as a cornerstone of good clinical practice, promising to improve the treatment of patients and the quality of surgical education. However, evidence-based surgery requires dedicated clinicians trained to perform methodologically sound clinical investigations. Statistical knowledge is therefore invaluable. Surgical studies often cannot be randomized. Propensity scores offer a powerful alternative to multivariable analysis in the assessment of observational, non-randomized surgical studies. Unfortunately, many surgeons are unaware of this important analytical approach that has gained increasing stature in medical research. Thus, propensity score analyses are not used often in surgical studies. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of propensity score analysis, allowing the surgeon to understand the role, advantages and limitations of propensity scores, boosting their development in surgical investigations. Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adamina, M., Guller, U., Weber, W. P., & Oertli, D. (2006, April). Propensity scores and the surgeon. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5265

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free