The Class II Carriere Motion appliance:

Abstract

Objectives: To determine three-dimensional treatment changes produced by the Class II Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) in Class II adolescent patients with Class I and Class II skeletal relationships. Materials and Methods: The sample included 59 adolescents (16 boys and 43 girls) with unilateral or bilateral Class II molar and bilateral Class II canine relationship. They were divided into group 1 with skeletal Class I (N = 27; ANB 2.908 6 1.408; 13.30 6 1.53 years) and group 2 with skeletal Class II (N = 32; ANB 6.068 6 1.648; 13.26 6 1.76 years). Cone beam computed tomography images were traced with Invivo software pretreatment (T1) and post-CMA usage (T2). The treatment changes in 36 measurements were calculated in each group, and the changes in 16 measurements were compared between them. Results: In group 1 and 2, maxillary first molars underwent significant distal movement (1.92 mm 6 ± 0.80 mm and 1.67 mm 6 1.56 mm, respectively) with distal tipping and rotation, maxillary canines underwent significant distal movement (2.34 mm 6 1.07 mm and 2.24 mm 6 1.91 mm, respectively) with distal tipping and rotation, and mandibular molars underwent significant mesial movement (-1.37 mm 6 1.23 mm and -2.51 mm 6 1.51 mm, respectively) with mesial tipping. Between the groups, there were significant differences in mandibular molar mesial movement and the U1-SN changes (P.05). Conclusions: The CMA corrected Class II malocclusion through distal tipping and rotational movement of maxillary canines and molars and corrected mesial tipping of mandibular molars. Significantly more mandibular molar mesial movement and maxillary incisor flaring were observed in patients with skeletal Class II.