We need to be more critical toward digital interventions for eating disorders: A commentary on McClure et al. (2023)

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, numerous digital interventions (also referred to as “e-mental health” interventions) have been developed for the prevention and treatment of eating disorders and several meta-analyses have summarized the existing evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of such interventions. Based on the present systematic review of McClure and Colleagues, the question of how and for whom digital interventions for eating disorders actually work, remains unanswered. In the absence of reliable mediators and moderators of outcome, priorities for future research are discussed (e.g., a need for more rigorous RCTs with credible comparators). The resulting research agenda is expansive. However, even though this process will take time and might seem slow (especially, in contrast to the rapidity of technological developments), we should not accept a lowering of the quality bar in research on digital interventions compared to other intervention research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bauer, S., & Moessner, M. (2024, May 1). We need to be more critical toward digital interventions for eating disorders: A commentary on McClure et al. (2023). International Journal of Eating Disorders. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free