Systemic curricular injustice in initial teacher education through curriculum control and marketization

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper argues that recent initial teacher education policy in England, combining curricular control and marketisation, presents a case of systemic curricular injustice. The initial teacher education core content framework, the government mandated content for all initial teacher education in England, represents a centralised curriculum that ignores local contexts and needs. Combined with the impact of the accreditation process for all providers embedded within the Initial Teacher Training (ITT) Market Review, these policies create a two-pronged system of exclusion: the core content framework restricts intellectual access to alternative ways of thinking about education, whilst the ITT Market Review restricts physical access to teacher education seeking to present such alternative approaches. Combining and mutually reinforcing social and spatial injustices, this paper argues that the policy space in England is actively producing and reproducing structural inequalities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brooks, C. (2026). Systemic curricular injustice in initial teacher education through curriculum control and marketization. Curriculum Journal, 37(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.332

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free