COMPARING INSPIRE and OPENSTREETMAP DATA: HOW to MAKE the MOST out of the TWO WORLDS

11Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The beginning of our century has seen the rise of Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) and crowdsourced geographic information projects. This study analyses and compares the most relevant initiatives for Europe in both contexts: INSPIRE, the Directive aiming to establish a pan-European SDI used for environmental policies, and OpenStreetMap (OSM), the largest and richest crowdsourced geospatial database. Similarities and differences, advantages and disadvantages of the two initiatives from an end user perspective are presented for a number of characteristics: underlying approach and governance, spatial scope, data structure and encoding, data access, and licensing framework. Overall, both initiatives have developed specific strengths and have achieved different types and degrees of interoperability, which would make their integration highly beneficial to multiple stakeholders. From the pure technical perspective, such integration is fully enabled by the maturity of the available FOSS4G, which offers specific support for both INSPIRE and OSM resources, also reviewed in the paper.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Minghini, M., Kotsev, A., & Lutz, M. (2019). COMPARING INSPIRE and OPENSTREETMAP DATA: HOW to MAKE the MOST out of the TWO WORLDS. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives (Vol. 42, pp. 167–174). International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W14-167-2019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free