GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study

44Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: With emergence of chatbots to help authors with scientific writings, editors should have tools to identify artificial intelligence-generated texts. GPTZero is among the first websites that has sought media attention claiming to differentiate machine-generated from human-written texts. Methods: Using 20 text pieces generated by ChatGPT in response to arbitrary questions on various topics in medicine and 30 pieces chosen from previously published medical articles, the performance of GPTZero was assessed. Results: GPTZero had a sensitivity of 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.85); specificity, 0.90 (0.73–0.98); accuracy, 0.80 (0.66–0.90); and positive and negative likelihood ratios, 6.5 (2.1–19.9) and 0.4 (0.2–0.7), respectively. Conclusion: GPTZero has a low false-positive (classifying a human-written text as machine-generated) and a high false-negative rate (classifying a machine-generated text as human-written).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habibzadeh, F. (2023). GPTZero Performance in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Texts: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(38). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free