Alignment and Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Press-Fit, Offset, Diaphyseal-Engaging Stem Extensions, and Eccentric Reaming Technique

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: A revision total knee arthroplasty must control limb alignment, often to address the cause of failure. Press-fit stems that engage the diaphysis with cement restricted to the metaphysis constitute one fixation technique. These long stems restrict coronal alignment of the prosthesis and as a result reduce the likelihood of extreme malposition. For the same reasons, long stems can make it difficult to manipulate alignment and achieve a specific coronal alignment angle. Nevertheless, femoral stems with a tight diaphyseal fit may still occupy a small range of varus-valgus positions due to the conical distal femoral metaphysis. Pulling the reamer toward the lateral endosteum increases femoral component coronal alignment toward a valgus direction and pushing the reamer medially increases alignment in a more varus direction. A straight stem, in combination with a medially directed reaming, would result in a femoral component that overhangs medially, but an offset stem can recenter the femoral component and maintain the desired alignment. We hypothesized that diaphyseal fit plus this reaming technique can control limb coronal alignment and provide fixation. Methods: This was a retrospective clinical and long-leg radiographic study of consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties with minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were correlated with New Zealand Joint Registry data to identify rerevisions of 111 consecutive revision knee arthroplasties, 92 after exclusions, at a minimum 2-year (range, 2 to 10) follow-up. Results: Mean femoral and tibial canal fill exceeded 91% on antero-posterior and lateral radiographs. The mean hip-knee-ankle angle was 179.6o (174.9-184.0) with 80% within ± 3o of neutral. The hip-ankle axis crossed the central Kennedy zone in 76.5% of cases and the other 24.6% crossed the inner medial and inner lateral zones. Tibial components: 99.0% ± 3o. Femoral components: 89.5% within ± 3o. There were 5 knees that failed due to infection, 3 from femoral loosening, and 1 due to recurvatum instability from polio. Conclusions: This study describes a surgical plan and technique for achieving target coronal alignment with press-fit diaphyseal fixation. It is the only series of revision knee arthroplasties with diaphyseal press-fit stems to report canal fill in 2 planes and coronal alignment on full-length radiographs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vince, K. G., Hoskins, W. T., & English, M. (2023). Alignment and Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Press-Fit, Offset, Diaphyseal-Engaging Stem Extensions, and Eccentric Reaming Technique. Journal of Arthroplasty, 38(6), S302–S307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free