Surgical outcomes of bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recession and resection for the divergence excess type of intermittent exotropia

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To compare bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) with unilateral recession and resection (RR) for divergence excess intermittent exotropia (IXT). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 66 patients with divergence excess IXT who underwent either BLR or RR from January 2013 to December 2020 was conducted. Data on demographics, pre- and postoperative deviations, fusion, stereopsis, control, and accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio were collected. Success was defined as esodeviation ≤5 PD (prism diopter) to exodeviation ≤10 PD with a follow-up time of at least 8.0 ± 2.0 weeks. Results: BLR (42 cases) and RR (24 cases) groups had the same success rate (83.3%, P = 0.688) and similar reduced postoperative deviations both in distance and at near (P > 0.05). Near-distance disparity decreased significantly in both groups (P = 0.000) with no intergroup difference (P = 0.193). Conclusion: BLR and RR were equally effective for divergence excess IXT with comparable outcomes of both distance and near deviations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, M., Shen, T., Wang, X., Yu, X., Zhu, B., Wen, Y., & Yan, J. (2023). Surgical outcomes of bilateral lateral rectus recession versus unilateral recession and resection for the divergence excess type of intermittent exotropia. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(11), 3558–3562. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2977_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free