The Political Culture of Authoritarianism in Mexico: A Reexamination

56Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite certain early efforts to interpret Mexico as a pluralist constitutional democracy, or democracy-in-the-making (Scott 1959; Tucker 1957), scholars today almost universally agree that the political system of Mexico is authoritarian. The trappings of Mexico's liberal constitution and elections notwithstanding, Mexico's Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) serves to integrate the polity under the highly centralized control of a single institution that dominates access to all public office. At the apex of the PRI is the Mexican president, who not only chooses his own successor but controls access to the PRI's candidate lists for all other public offices and therefore dominates both the party and the congress. In sum, as Coleman and Davis argue, Mexico fits the ideal type of authoritarian political organization because decisions are made almost exclusively by the ruling elite rather than by democratic, pluralist processes and because there are severe restrictions placed upon political mobilization (1976, 195).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Booth, J. A., & Seligson, M. A. (1984). The Political Culture of Authoritarianism in Mexico: A Reexamination. In Latin American Research Review (Vol. 19, pp. 106–124). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100015776

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free