Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System

23Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study reports a clinical evaluation of AiDEX CGM system featuring a 14-day sensor, real-time glucose monitoring and factory-calibration. A multicenter, prospective, masked clinical study was conducted at with a total of 120 participants. Each participant wore 4 studied sensors and had one in-clinic visit for venous blood reference tests. 40 out of the 120 participants wore additional Abbott Libre sensors and performed at least 7 capillary BG tests daily for additional reference and comparison. Continuous glucose error grid analysis (CG-EGA) showed that AiDEX and Abbott Libre had good agreement with venous blood glucose, with 98.69% and 98.96% accurate readings, respectively. Overall MARD of AiDEX CGM systems was 9.08% when compared to venous blood reference and 10.1% when compared to finger capillary BG reference.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ji, L., Guo, L., Zhang, J., Li, Y., & Chen, Z. (2023). Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 17(1), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968211037991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free