Primary staging and follow-up in melanoma patients - Monocenter evaluation of methods, costs and patient survival

148Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a German cohort of 661 melanoma patients the performance, costs and survival benefits of staging methods (history and physical examination; chest X-ray; ultrasonography of the abdomen; high resolution sonography of the peripheral lymph nodes) were assessed at initial staging and during follow-up of stage I/II+III disease. At initial staging, 74% (23 out of 31) of synchronous metastases were first detected by physical examination followed by sonography of the lymph nodes revealing 16% (5 out of 31). Other imaging methods were less efficient (Chest X-ray: one out of 31; sonography of abdomen: two out of 31). Nearly 24% of all 127 first recurrences and 18% of 73 second recurrences developed in patients not participating in the follow-up programme. In follow-up patients detection of first or second recurrence were attributed to history and physical examination on a routine visit in 47 and 52% recurrences, respectively, and to routine imaging procedures in 21 and 17% of cases, respectively. Lymph node sonography was the most successful technical staging procedure indicating 13% of first relapses, but comprised 24% of total costs of follow-up in stage I/II. Routine imaging comprised nearly 50% of total costs for follow-up in stage I/II and in stage III. The mode of detecting a relapse ('patient vs. doctor-diagnosed' or 'symptomatic vs asymptomatic') did not significantly influence patients overall survival. Taken together, imaging procedures for routine follow-up in stage I/II and stage III melanoma patients were inefficient and not cost-efficient. © 2002 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hofmann, U., Szedlak, M., Rittgen, W., Jung, E. G., & Schadendorf, D. (2002). Primary staging and follow-up in melanoma patients - Monocenter evaluation of methods, costs and patient survival. British Journal of Cancer, 87(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600428

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free