Active identification of vertebral fracture in the FLS model of care

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1 year, infiltrative or neoplastic disease were excluded. The number and severity of VFs (Genant) were analyzed. Treatment initiation in the first 6 months after baseline visit was reviewed. Results: Overall, 570 patients were included, mean age 73. The most common route for identifying VF was through referral to OMC (303 cases), followed by the emergency registry (198) and DXA-VFA (69). Osteoporosis by DXA was found in 312 (58%) patients and 259 (45%) had ≥ 2 VFs. The rate of grade 3 VFs was highest among patients on the emergency registry. Those identified through OMC had a higher number of VFs, a higher rate of osteoporosis, more risk factors and greater treatment initiation. Patients with VFs detected by DXA-VFA were mostly women with a single VF and had a lower rate of osteoporosis by DXA. Conclusions: We present the distribution of VFs by the route of identification in an FLS. Promoting referral by other doctors with a training campaign may help in the quality improvement of the FLS-based model of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubiño, F. J., Naranjo, A., Molina, A., Fuentes, S., Santana, F., Navarro, R., … Ojeda, S. (2023). Active identification of vertebral fracture in the FLS model of care. Archives of Osteoporosis, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01289-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free