Occupational injury costs and alternative employment in construction trades

23Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present the costs of fatal and non-fatal days-away-from-work injuries in 50 construction occupations. Our results also provide indirect evidence on the cost exposure of alternative construction workers such as independent contractors, on-call or day labor, contract workers, and temporary workers. METHODS: We combine data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on average annual incidence from 2000 to 2002 with updated per-case costs from an existing cost model for occupational injuries. The Current Population Survey provides data on the percentage of alternative construction workers. RESULTS: Construction laborers and carpenters were the two costliest occupations, with 40% of the industry's injury costs. The 10 costliest construction occupations also have a high percentage of alternative workers. CONCLUSIONS: The construction industry has both a high rate of alternative employment and high costs of work injury. Alternative workers, often lacking workers' compensation, are especially exposed to injury costs. ©2007The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waehrer, G. M., Dong, X. S., Miller, T., Men, Y., & Haile, E. (2007). Occupational injury costs and alternative employment in construction trades. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49(11), 1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318156ed24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free