Influence of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery for corneal astigmatism up to 2.5 dioptres on corneal densitometry

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose:: To assess the effect of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRI) for astigmatism between 0.75 and 2.5 dioptres during cataract surgery on corneal densitometry (CD). Methods:: In this prospective, randomised study, 80 eyes (80 patients), received either tIOL or PCRI. Assessment at pre-operative and 1, 3, 6, 12 months post-operative visit included uncorrected (UCDVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ) (only post-operatively), mean anterior and posterior keratometric astigmatism (K A ) and CD with Schiempflug system. CD was analysed in four concentric radial zones from centre to periphery (Zone 1 to 4) and in 3 layers (anterior, mid-stromal and posterior). Results:: Comparing tIOLs vs. PCRIs, there was no significant difference in the UCDVA, BCDVA and SEQ. In PCRI group, anterior K A decreased at 1 month and remained stable thereafter. For zones 1, 2 and 3, CD significantly reduced after 3 months with tIOLs whereas with PCRIs, it reduced 1 month onwards. For zone 4, CD reduced only at 12 months with tIOLs compared to 3 months onwards with PCRIs. In both groups CD was higher in the zone 4 and anterior layer. Significant reduction in CD was found in all three layers of cornea after 3 months in tIOL and after first month in PCRI groups, respectively. Conclusions:: Cataract surgery alone reduces the CD. Reducing keratometric astigmatism with PCRIs shows significant differences in CD from early post-operative period for central and anterior corneal layer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zukaite, I., Bedi, K. K., Ali, S., & Nanavaty, M. A. (2019). Influence of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery for corneal astigmatism up to 2.5 dioptres on corneal densitometry. Eye (Basingstoke), 33(5), 804–811. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0327-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free