Estimation of percentage body fat in 6- to 13-year-old children by skinfold thickness, body mass index and waist circumference

40Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We evaluated the accuracy of skinfold thicknesses, BMI and waist circumference for the prediction of percentage body fat (PBF) in a representative sample of 372 Swiss children aged 6-13 years. PBF was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. On the basis of a preliminary bootstrap selection of predictors, seven regression models were evaluated. All models included sex, age and pubertal stage plus one of the following predictors: (1) log-transformed triceps skinfold (logTSF); (2) logTSF and waist circumference; (3) log-transformed sum of triceps and subscapular skinfolds (logSF2); (4) log-transformed sum of triceps, biceps, subscapular and supra-iliac skinfolds (logSF4); (5) BMI; (6) waist circumference; (7) BMI and waist circumference. The adjusted determination coefficient (R2adj) and the root mean squared error (RMSE; kg) were calculated for each model. LogSF4 (R 2adj085; RMSE 235) and logSF2 (R 2adj 082; RMSE 254) were similarly accurate at predicting PBF and superior to logTSF (R 2adj075; RMSE 302), logTSF combined with waist circumference (R 2adj078; RMSE 285), BMI (R 2adj062; RMSE 373), waist circumference (R 2adj058; RMSE 389), and BMI combined with waist circumference (R 2adj063; RMSE 366) (P<0001 for all values of R -{2adj). The finding that logSF4 was only modestly superior to logSF2 and that logTSF was better than BMI and waist circumference at predicting PBF has important implications for paediatric epidemiological studies aimed at disentangling the effect of body fat on health outcomes. © The Authors 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kriemler, S., Puder, J., Zahner, L., Roth, R., Meyer, U., & Bedogni, G. (2010). Estimation of percentage body fat in 6- to 13-year-old children by skinfold thickness, body mass index and waist circumference. British Journal of Nutrition, 104(10), 1565–1572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510002357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free