The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature

249Citations
Citations of this article
665Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two surveys of over 1,700 publications whose authors use quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reveal a lack of transparent and comprehensive reporting of essential technical information. Reporting standards are significantly improved in publications that cite the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, although such publications are still vastly outnumbered by those that do not. © 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bustin, S. A., Benes, V., Garson, J., Hellemans, J., Huggett, J., Kubista, M., … Vandesompele, J. (2013, November). The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2697

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free