Simultaneous Flapless Implant Placement and Peri‐Implant Defect Correction: An Experimental Pilot Study in Dogs

  • Jeong S
  • Choi B
  • Li J
  • et al.
13Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive implant surgery allows clinicians to place implants in less time, without extensive flaps, and with less bleeding and postoperative discomfort. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new surgical technique by which implants are inserted in a deficient alveolar ridge using a flapless technique simultaneously with a peri‐implant defect correction that is performed using a subperiosteal tunneling procedure. Methods: Bilateral, horizontal defects of the alveolar ridge were created in the mandibles of five mongrel dogs. After 3 months of healing, one implant was placed on each side of the mandible by a flapless procedure. The exposed threads of the implant on one side of the mandible were covered with a 1:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture using a subperiosteal tunneling technique. Four months later, biopsies of the implant sites were taken and prepared for ground sectioning and analysis. Results: All implants were well osseointegrated with the host bone. All of the peri‐implant defects at the test sites were covered with tissue that resembled bone. In all specimens, a mixture of bone, connective tissue, and residual bone particles was observed in the graft area. In the control sites, where no graft was used, none of the exposed threads on any implants were covered with new bone. Conclusion: This preliminary report indicates the potential use of a minimally invasive flapless technique as a substitute for a more invasive implant placement and ridge augmentation procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeong, S., Choi, B., Li, J., & Xuan, F. (2008). Simultaneous Flapless Implant Placement and Peri‐Implant Defect Correction: An Experimental Pilot Study in Dogs. Journal of Periodontology, 79(5), 876–880. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free