Early prediction for persistent inflammation-immunosuppression catabolism syndrome in surgical sepsis patients

17Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To find the predictors for persistent inflammation-immunosuppression catabo-lism syndrome in ICU surgical septic patients. Design: Single center observation study. Participants: Inclusion: 1) patients ≥18, 2) admitted to the ICU after major surgery or transferred to the ICU within 48 hours after the diagnosis of sepsis following the definition of sepsis-3.0. Exclusion: 1) pregnant or lactating patients, 2) patients with severe immune deficiency, 3) patients that expired within 14 days after the diagnosis of sepsis. Results: A total of 169 participants were included. After propensity score matching, PICS patients were found to have higher intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (32.4% vs 12.4%, p=0.046), 90-day mortality (32.4% vs 9.1%, p=0.006), and ICU-acquired infection rate (44.1% vs 12.7%, p<0.001), and longer ICU stays (29 vs 11 days, p<0.001) comparing to non-PICS patients. In multivariate logistic regression, it demonstrated that the SOFA score, Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI), albumin level on the ICU day 1, and lymphocyte count on the ICU day 3 were statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with the receiver operating characteristic curve for a combination of the four parameters and the area under the curve was 0.838 (95% confidence interval 0.774–0.901). Conclusion: The chronic disease condition and decreased immunity in the early course of sepsis were crucial for PICS. The combination of CCI, SOFA score, albumin level on ICU Day 1 and lymphocyte count on ICU Day 3 can be early predictor for PICS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhong, M., Pan, T., Sun, N. N., Tan, R. M., Xu, W., Qiu, Y. Z., … Qu, H. P. (2021). Early prediction for persistent inflammation-immunosuppression catabolism syndrome in surgical sepsis patients. International Journal of General Medicine, 14, 5441–5448. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S331411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free