Optimum tariffs and retaliation revisited: How country size matters

68Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

In his seminal work on tariff retaliation, Johnson (Review of Economic Studies, 21, 1953-1954) showed that a country will "win" a bilateral "tariff war" if its relative monopoly/monopsony power in world trade is sufficiently large. However, it is unclear from Johnson's analysis and from subsequent research on the subject how this power is determined in general economic environments. An important goal of this paper is to address this issue. With the help of a neoclassical trade model in which country size is at centre stage, it is shown that a sufficient condition for a country to prefer a non-cooperative Nash tariff equilibrium (retaliation) over free trade is that its relative size be sufficiently large. The paper also refines the structure of the general trade model and generates additional characterization results on the importance of country size for best-response tariff functions, retaliatory tariffs, and welfare.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Syropoulos, C. (2002). Optimum tariffs and retaliation revisited: How country size matters. Review of Economic Studies, 69(3), 707–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.t01-1-00028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free