P14.128 Lack of development of Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia in a cohort of 103 Italian glioblastoma patients not receiving prophylaxis during post-surgical chemoradiotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with high grade gliomas (HGG) usually receive surgery, radiation, temozolomide (TMZ) and corticosteroids. A major concern in patients who receive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the risk of developing secondary myelosuppression and a related infection during treatment. CRT may also lead to a long-lasting reduction of WBC, associated with early death from tumor progression. Among treatment-related infections, Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia (PJP) has been reported, since then, PJP prophylaxis has been required by the FDA. However, evidence for PJP during CRT is very limited limited and the rate of PJP still low. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We did a retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved cohort study in 103 patients (60 men and 43 women), who were consecutively diagnosed with GBM in 'A. Manzoni' Hospital in Lecco during the period May 2007 to December 2013. All of these patients were treated with CRT according to the Stupp protocol without PJP prophylaxis. Haematological toxicities of CRT were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 5.0; November 27, 2017). The objective of our study was to investigate the association between CRT and myelosuppression and we evaluated the types of infection contracted on CRT and in particular if the absence of a proper PJP prophylaxis led to an increased rate of PJP. RESULTS: In our cohort, among 103 patients receiving CRT, 18% developed severe lymphopenia. Among all the subjects enrolled, a total of 9 patients (8.7%) had documented infectious complications during the CRT. Three patients developed community acquired pneumonia. Moreover, we documented three cases of fever without source, two urinary tract infections, one herpes zoster, one herpes simplex 1, one phlegmon and one purulent otitis. However, no one of these patients was diagnosed as PJP despite PJP prophylaxis was not given. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our data seem to support a lack of undisputable evidence for a favorable risk/benefit profile in the use of PJP prophylaxis for all newly diagnosed GBM patients undergoing the CRT, also considering the rate of adverse reactions (15.2%) and severe adverse reactions (around 3%, mainly leukopenia) in non-HIV adults receiving trimethoprim/ sulphametoxazole for prolonged periods.