Protection against cold air and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction while on regular treatment with Oxis®

22Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the duration of protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after inhalation of formoterol (Oxis®) Turbuhaler® with that of terbutaline Turbuhaler® and placebo Turbuhaler® in asthmatic patients treated regularly with formoterol Turbuhaler® 9 μg b.i.d. and inhaled steroids. The study, performed at three centres (Göteborg and Lund, Sweden, and Trondheim, Norway), consisted of an open-label part with formoterol Turbuhaler® 9 μg b.i.d. and a randomized, double-blind, cross-over part with a single dose (on top of the regular treatment) of either formoterol Turbuhaler® 9 μg, terbutaline Turbuhaler® 0.5 mg or placebo Turbuhaler®. The patients attended the clinic six times: twice for screening visits, three times for randomized treatment and once for a follow-up visit. Patients received regular b.i.d. treatment with formoterol 9 μg for a mean period of 16 days. Formoterol gave a post-exercise fall of 12, 10, 15 and 17% in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 15 min, 4, 8 and 12 h after inhalation. The differences compared with placebo (falls of 26, 22, 23 and 22%) and terbutaline (falls of 17, 18, 22 and 22%) were all statistically significant (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Patients on regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler® 9 μg b.i.d. have a significant protection against EIB up to 12 h after inhalation of formoterol 9 μg. The protection was also significantly better than that of terbutaline Turbuhaler® 0.5 mg. © 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vilsvik, J., Ankerst, J., Palmqvist, M., Persson, G., Schaanning, J., Schwabe, G., & Johansson, Å. (2001). Protection against cold air and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction while on regular treatment with Oxis®. Respiratory Medicine, 95(6), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.2001.1074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free