Biological practices and fields, missing pieces of the biomimetics’ methodological puzzle

25Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Facing current biomimetics impediments, recent studies have supported the integration within biomimetic teams of a new actor having biological knowledge and know-how. This actor is referred to as the “biomimetician” in this article. However, whereas biology is often considered a homogenous whole in the methodological literature targeting biomimetics, it actually gathers fundamentally different fields. Each of these fields is structured around specific practices, tools, and reasoning. Based on this observation, we wondered which knowledge and know-how, and so biological fields, should characterize biomimeticians. Following the design research methodology, this article thus investigates the operational integration of two biological fields, namely ecology and phylogenetics, as a starting point in the establishment of the biomimetician’s biological tools and practices. After a descriptive phase identifying specific needs and potential conceptual bridges, we presented various ways of applying biological expertise during biomimetic processes in the prescriptive phase of the study. Finally, we discussed current limitations and future research axes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graeff, E., Maranzana, N., & Aoussat, A. (2020). Biological practices and fields, missing pieces of the biomimetics’ methodological puzzle. Biomimetics, 5(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5040062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free