Urinary Marker Profiles in Heart Failure with Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Recent data suggest different causes of renal dysfunction between heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) versus preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We therefore studied a wide range of urinary markers reflecting different nephron segments in heart failure patients. Methods: In 2070, in chronic heart failure patients, we measured several established and upcoming urinary markers reflecting different nephron segments. Results: Mean age was 70 ± 12 years, 74% was male and 81% (n = 1677) had HFrEF. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in patients with HFpEF (56 ± 23 versus 63 ± 23 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.001). Patients with HFpEF had significantly higher values of NGAL (58.1 [24.0–124.8] versus 28.1 [14.6–66.9] μg/gCr, P < 0.001) and KIM-1 (2.28 [1.49–4.37] versus 1.79 [0.85–3.49] μg/gCr, P = 0.001). These differences were more pronounced in patients with an eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2. Conclusions: HFpEF patients showed more evidence of tubular damage and/or dysfunction compared with HFrEF patients, in particular when glomerular function was preserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Streng, K. W., Hillege, H. L., ter Maaten, J. M., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Dickstein, K., Samani, N. J., … Damman, K. (2024). Urinary Marker Profiles in Heart Failure with Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 17(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-023-10356-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free