Why methodology is important: Coffee as a candidate treatment for COVID-19?

4Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: During this pandemic situation, some studies have led to hasty conclusions about Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment, due to a lack of methodology. This pedagogic study aimed to highlight potential biases in research on COVID-19 treatment. Methods: We evaluate the effect of coffee’s active part, 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine (TMX) on patients with COVID-19. A cohort of 93 patients, with a diagnosis of COVID-19 is analyzed. Results: TMX group and control group included, respectively, 26 and 67 patients. In the TMX group, patients had a median length of stay in hospital of 5.5 days shorter than in the control group (9.5 vs. 15 days, p < 0.05). Patients in the control group were more severe than patients in the TMX group with a significantly higher National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2 score) (8 vs. 6, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Multiple biases prevents us from concluding to an effect of coffee on COVID-19. Despite an important social pressure during this crisis, methodology and conscientiousness are the best way to avoid hasty conclusions that can be deleterious for patients. Identifier: NCT04395742.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belaroussi, Y., Roblot, P., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Delaye, T., Mathoulin-Pelissier, S., Lemeux, J., … Bleibtreu, A. (2020). Why methodology is important: Coffee as a candidate treatment for COVID-19? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(11), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113691

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free