A randomized crossover comparison of team-based learning and lecture format on learning outcomes

40Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective. To compare learning outcomes and student confidence between team-based learning (TBL) and lecture. Methods. A crossover study was conducted with 30 students divided into two sections. Each section was taught six therapeutic topics (three TBL and three lecture). There were two assessments of 24 questions each. A survey (Likert scale) assessing student confidence and attitudes was administered at the end. Results. A significantly higher overall examination score was observed for TBL as compared to lecture. Students were more confident in providing therapeutic recommendations following TBL. Higher survey scores favoring TBL were also seen related to critical-thinking skills and therapeutic knowledge. Conclusion. Learning outcomes and student confidence in performing higher-order tasks were significantly higher with TBL. The findings of this novel crossover type design showed that TBL is an effective pedagogy.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bleske, B. E., Remington, T. L., Wells, T. D., Klein, K. C., Guthrie, S. K., Tingen, J. M., … Dorsch, M. P. (2016). A randomized crossover comparison of team-based learning and lecture format on learning outcomes. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(7). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe807120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free