Carotid atherosclerosis in normal-weight metabolic syndrome

31Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether or not individuals with a normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5 kg/m2-24.9 kg/m2), but who also fulfill the criteria for the metabolic syndrome (MetS) class, can be associated with carotid atherosclerosis. Methods: The subjects were consecutive in-patients with a normal BMI (18.5 kg/m2-24.9 kg/m2) in the Medical Department of Seiyo Municipal Nomura Hospital enrolled between September 1996 and February 2006. The subjects were 452 men aged 69±15 (mean±standard deviation) years and 542 women aged 74±13 years. Carotid atherosclerosis was assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) on B-mode ultrasonography. Results: Compared with men with BMI 18.5 kg/m2 to 20.9 kg/m, the odds ratios of the MetS were 2.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-4.76) for men with BMI 21 kg/m2 to 22.9 kg/m2 and 6.13 (95% CI, 3.57-10.5) for men with BMI 23.0 kg/m2 to 24.9 kg/m2 after controlling for age, smoking status, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and uric acid. Using the same regression model and BMI categories in women, the odds ratios were 2.52 (95% CI, 1.42-2.83) and 4.38 (95% CI, 2.42-7.92), respectively. Multivariate-adjusted carotid IMT was significantly greater in men with than without MetS, especially in patients with BMI 23.0 kg/m2 to 24.9 kg/m2. Although in women, there were no inter-group differences in categories of normal BMI and MetS. Conclusion: Individuals in the upper normal BMI range have a relatively high prevalence and are at increased risk of having metabolic syndrome. Therefore, screening of individuals with normal or slightly elevated BMI is important in preventing atherosclerosis. © 2007 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawamoto, R., Ohtsuka, N., Ninomiya, D., & Nakamura, S. (2007). Carotid atherosclerosis in normal-weight metabolic syndrome. Internal Medicine, 46(21), 1771–1777. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0261

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free