Surface reconstruction amendment to the intrinsic sampling method

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The intrinsic sampling method (ISM) is a powerful tool that allows the exploration of interfacial properties from molecular simulations by fitting a function that represents the local boundary between two phases. However, owing to the non-physical nature of an “intrinsic” surface, there remains an ambiguity surrounding the comparison of theoretical properties with the physical world. It is therefore important that the ISM remains internally consistent when reproducing simulated properties which match experiments, such as the surface tension or interfacial density distribution. We show that the current ISM procedure causes an over-fitting of the surface to molecules in the interface region, leading to a biased distribution of curvature at these molecular coordinates. We assert that this biased distribution is a cause of the disparity between predicted interfacial densities upon convolution to a laboratory frame, an artefact which has been known to exist since the development of the ISM. We present an improvement to the fitting procedure of the ISM in an attempt to alleviate the ambiguity surrounding the true nature of an intrinsic surface. Our “surface reconstruction” method is able to amend the shape of the interface so as to reproduce the global curvature distribution at all sampled molecular coordinates. We present the effects that this method has on the ISM predicted structure of a simulated Lennard-Jones fluid air-liquid interface. Additionally, we report an unexpected relationship between surface thermodynamic predictions of our reconstructed ISM surfaces and those of extended capillary wave theory, which is of current interest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Longford, F. G. J., Essex, J. W., Skylaris, C. K., & Frey, J. G. (2018). Surface reconstruction amendment to the intrinsic sampling method. Journal of Chemical Physics, 149(23). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free