Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research

673Citations
Citations of this article
430Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A review of 30 studies published since 1980 found evidence for the continued existence of sexual double standards: different standards of sexual permissiveness for women and men. Experimental studies have included predominantly White North American college students; ethnographies, focus group and interview studies, and linguistic analyses have included more diverse samples. Studies show that sexual double standards are influenced by situational and interpersonal factors (e.g., the target's age, level of relationship commitment, and number of partners), and that double standards are local constructions, differing across ethnic and cultural groups. This review discusses methodological issues, including the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative approaches. It also discusses implications for women's high-risk sexual behavior and sexual identity, and suggests directions for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003, February 1). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research. Society for the Scientific Study of Sex Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free